Pre-litigation tax review: know your exposure before URA does, and your case before it goes to court

An independent test of your tax case, issue by issue, before you commit to the Tribunal or court.

As soon as litigation is realistic, and ideally before pleadings are filed. Its value shrinks as positions lock in.

Yes. Disclosed before URA finds it, or before an audit starts, unpaid tax may be settled on the principal alone, without interest or penalties, under an agreement with URA. The relief depends on telling URA something it doesn't already hold, so we check what it can already see first.

URA's 2026/27 programme lets residents disclose foreign income earned in 2024 and 2025 with interest and penalties that may be waived in full if the disclosure qualifies and is made before URA finds the income. We confirm what qualifies and handle the disclosure.

No. Your advocates argue the case; we test and strengthen the tax-technical record it stands on.

30 days to apply to the Tribunal after the objection decision, then 30 days to appeal each decision to the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

You have 30 days to appeal to the High Court. The review tells you whether an appeal is worth it.

Knowing the true strength of URA's position quickly decides whether you fight or settle.

We scope it in the conversation by tax head, year and company, and the review fee is fixed in a written proposal before work starts.

It starts with a conversation, at no charge. The review is then quoted in a written proposal, starting from UGX 4,000,000 per company and priced by the tax heads and years involved. Voluntary disclosure and court-stage support are quoted personally, on what's at stake.

Then you've learned it at the lowest cost, while settlement is still possible on reasonable terms.

Yes, and where proceedings are live we work within your advocates' privilege arrangements.